“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.”
Ich die Wahlfälschung-Vorwürfe von Trump und die Argumente der KVI passen pefekt zu diesem weisen richterlichen Spruch.
Deshalb: Nein zur KVI.
Keine Kommentare
Kommentar verfassen Cancel